MASA KERJA DAN USIA BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN PRAKTIK KOLABORASI INTERPROFESIONAL PADA RAWAT INAP RUMAH SAKIT

  • Sulistyaningsih Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta
  • Fitnaningsih Endang Cahyani Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Jl. Siliwangi No. 63 Pundung, Nogotirto, Gamping, Sleman, DIY, 55292
  • Nuli Nuryati Zulala
  • Sri Lestari Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Jl. Siliwangi No. 63 Pundung, Nogotirto, Gamping, Sleman, DIY, 55292
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30989/mik.v9i2.352

Abstract

Background: The practice of interprofessional collaboration is one of the elements that determines the quality of inpatient services. As a result of dysfunctional or non-existent interprofessional collaborative health practices is a medical error, which is the leading cause of death worldwide.

Objective: to analyze factors related to interprofessional health collaboration in hospital hospitalization.

Methods: Survey research methods, with cross sectional approach. The sample of this study were doctors and health workers who provided care for 58 inpatients at PKU Muhammadiyah Gamping Hospital in June-July 2019 determined by consecutive sampling. Data was collected by filling out the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) questionnaire. Data analysis with chi-square.

Results: the practice of interprofessional collaboration in hospitalization is mostly good (mean index = 3.00). Years of service and age are significantly related to the practice of interprofessional collaboration in hospital hospitalization. Type of profession, gender, education, marital status and income are not related to the practice of interprofessional collaboration in hospital hospitalization.

Conclusion: The higher the work period and age of the healthcare professional, the better the practice of interprofessional collaboration in hospital hospitalization.

Author Biography

Sulistyaningsih, Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta

4x6blue1.jpg

References

1. Elizabeth McCay, Kristin Cleverley, Audrey Danaher NM. Collaborative partnerships- bridging the knowledge practice gap in client-centred care in mental health. J Ment Heal Training, Educ Pract 2015; 10: 51–60.
2. Hekmat SN, Dehnavieh R, Rahimisadegh R, et al. Team Attitude Evauation: An Evaluation In Hospital Committees. Mater Sociomed 2015; 27: 429–433.
3. Clancy CM, Tornberg DN. TeamSTEPPS: Assuring optimal teamwork in clinical settings. American Journal of Medical Quality. Epub ahead of print 2007. DOI: 10.1177/1062860607300616.
4. Kossaify A, Hleihel W, Lahoud JC. Team-based efforts to improve quality of care, the fundamental role of ethics, and the responsibility of health managers: monitoring and management strategies to enhance teamwork. Public Health. Epub ahead of print 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.08.007.
5. Wright MC, Phillips-Bute BG, Petrusa ER, et al. Assessing teamwork in medical education and practice: Relating behavioural teamwork ratings and clinical performance. Med Teach. Epub ahead of print 2009. DOI: 10.1080/01421590802070853.
6. Yulia Y. Analisis Kolaborasi Interprofesi Tenaga Kesehatan dalam Penanganan Pasien Rawat Inap High Care Unit (HCU) Penyakit dalam RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Tahun 2016. Universitas Andalas, 2016.
7. Utami L, Hapsari S, Widyandana. Hubungan Antara Sikap dan Perilaku Kolaborasi dan Praktik Kolaborasi Interprofesional Di Ruang Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih. J Keperawatan Muhammadiyah 2016; 1: 7–15.
8. Wicaksono WS, Purwanta, Nurjannah I. Gambaran Pelaksanaan Praktik Kolaborasi Dokter dan Perawat Ditinjau dari Pendekatan Interprofesi Di IGD RS PKU Muhammadiyah Kota Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta, 2017.
9. Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016; 1–5.
10. Lerner S, Magrane D, Friedman E. Teaching teamwork in medical education. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. Epub ahead of print 2009. DOI: 10.1002/msj.20129.
11. Myers JL, Well AD. Research Design and Statistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2002.
12. Singer T (ed). Statistical Methods. Second. Burlington, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press An imprint of Elsevier Science, 2003.
13. Atle Ødegard. Exploring perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in child mental health care. Int J Integr Care Int J Integr Care – 2006; 6: 1568–4156.
14. Karam M, Brault I, Van Durme T, et al. Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.002.
15. Brown S, Nelson J. The Use of Interprofessional Simulation among Chronic Pediatric Populations: A Review of the Literature. Clin Simul Nurs 2014; 10: e191–e197.
16. Glanz K, Rimer B. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. US: Departemen of Health and Human Services, 2005.
17. Patel H, Pettitt M, Wilson JR. Factors of collaborative working: A framework for a collaboration model. Appl Ergon 2012; 43: 1–26.
18. Avery MD, Montgomery O, Brandl-Salutz E. Essential Components of Successful Collaborative Maternity Care Models. The ACOG-ACNM Project. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2012; 39: 423–434.
19. Bell A V., Michalec B, Arenson C. The (stalled) progress of interprofessional collaboration: The role of gender. J Interprof Care 2014; 28: 98–102.
20. Chang Pecci C, Mottl-Santiago J, Culpepper L, et al. The Birth of a Collaborative Model. Obstetricians, Midwives, and Family Physicians. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2012; 39: 323–334.
21. Fisher MD, Weyant D, Sterrett S, et al. Perceptions of interprofessional collaborative practice and patient/family satisfaction. J Interprofessional Educ Pract 2017; 8: 95–102.
Published
2021-08-08
How to Cite
1.
Sulistyaningsih, Fitnaningsih Endang Cahyani, Nuli Nuryati Zulala, Sri Lestari. MASA KERJA DAN USIA BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN PRAKTIK KOLABORASI INTERPROFESIONAL PADA RAWAT INAP RUMAH SAKIT. Media ilmu kesehatan [Internet]. 2021Aug.8 [cited 2024Nov.19];9(2):111-7. Available from: https://ejournal.unjaya.ac.id/index.php/mik/article/view/352
Issue
Vol 9 No 2 (2020): Media Ilmu Kesehatan
Section
Articles

Articles received and published by the Media Ilmu Kesehatan are by the publication, the copyright of the article is fully transferred to the Media Ilmu Kesehatan. All operational forms such as printing, publication, and distribution of hard file journals are carried out by the Media Ilmu Kesehatan. Articles that have finished the review process and have been declared accepted by the journal manager or editor will be asked to fill out a statement of submission of copyright by the journal secretary to the main author or correspondent author. The statement of transfer of copyright is signed with a seal and sent via email to journalmik2018@gmail.com and contacted the admin of the journal to be followed up on archiving. Journal managers and editors have the right to edit the manuscript according to the provisions of the writing rules in the Media Ilmu Kesehatan.

Articles that have been declared accepted either online through the author's account on the OJS website https://ejournal.unjaya.ac.id/index.php/mik or a letter of receipt of the article (LOA), as well as those that have been published on OJS are not allowed to be published in other journals, or proceedings. The number of authors with more than one and as the main author or designated as the correspondent writer must have coordinated with members of the research team. The order of the authors submitted in the article as the author of one, two, three and so on cannot be changed when the article is published unless an error occurs in the technical operation of the journal.